One record, signed and cooked from
Re-typing a signed proposal into a kitchen sheet is exactly where the vegetarian count goes missing.
Industries · Food and beverage
The sale happens weeks before the food does, the headcount changes at least twice, and the whole job is knowing what the kitchen owes on Saturday and what is still owed to you on Monday.
The day, end to end
Six places a catering operation either stays in control of a date or starts guessing.
Re-typing a signed proposal into a kitchen sheet is exactly where the vegetarian count goes missing.
Money taken against an event that has not happened yet is a different thing from an unpaid invoice, and the reports should say which is which.
A number that can still move on Friday afternoon is a number nobody could buy against on Thursday.
Allergies written as free text get read once, by the person who typed them in.
Aggregate to buy, separate to load. Having one and not the other is how a tray leaves on the wrong truck.
Equipment tracked only in somebody's head is equipment you buy again every spring.
Buying guide
Seven questions worth asking any provider, us included.
Ask to see the same record from both sides.
Ask what the report calls that money before the event happens.
Ask what changes after it passes, and who is allowed to override it.
Ask for the count of every restriction on one event.
Ask for a Saturday with three jobs.
Ask what happened to last week's chafers.
Event history, client records and menus. Ask up front.
Questions
Because every transcription between them is a chance to lose the detail that matters most, which is almost always a dietary count or a timing change. When the client signs one document and the kitchen cooks from another, the two drift the moment anything changes, and on an event something always changes.
As money held against a dated future event rather than as payment on a finished job. It matters for the reports and it matters for the conversation when a date moves. Treated as ordinary revenue, the month looks one way, the deposit position looks another, and the two are reconciled by hand every time.
It gives the kitchen a number it can buy against. Ordering happens days before service, so a headcount that can still move on the afternoon before is a headcount nobody can act on. The deadline belongs on the event record, visible to the client, and should be overridable only by someone who knows what an override costs.
Because the line cooks to numbers. Six gluten-free plates is an instruction; a paragraph describing the guests is a paragraph. Counted restrictions also travel onto the pack list, which is where they are needed when the food is already loaded and nobody can read the original email.
Combined for purchasing, separate for loading. The kitchen needs one aggregated pull so it buys once, and each event needs its own pack list so the right trays go on the right truck. A system that produces only one of the two forces somebody to build the other by hand at five in the morning.
Free tools
Both are open to anybody comparing options.
The questionnaire asks a caterer the boarding questions — deposits taken months before the date, the balance taken on the day, and the delivery risk a processor sees in the gap between them. That gap is the whole underwriting conversation for catering and this is it in advance.
The statement audit reads a statement you already have and shows what the deposits cost you compared with the balances. Booking far ahead and collecting on the day are two different transactions, priced two different ways.
Talk to someone who has loaded a truck
Four fields. A person reads it, looks at what you are running now, and comes back with what they would actually change.
We will implement whatever is right for you — including keeping what you have. If your proposals and your kitchen already agree and the only gap is that final counts arrive by text message, that is a deadline field and a notification, not a new way of working.
Payco · Industries · Food and beverage · Catering
Last updated: 2026-08-17